The Fed Is Best Foundation gets the Semmelweis treatment


It was a tragedy in every respect.

Dr. Ignác Semmelweis was an obstetric physician in 19th century Vienna. He … was appointed to Vienna General Hospital in 1846. There, he became aware of a puzzling disparity.

The hospital offered two free maternity clinics for economically disadvantaged women. First Clinic was run by all-male doctors and medical students. Second Clinic was operated by midwives and their students. The clinics admitted on alternating days…

… Between ten and twenty percent of women in First Clinic died of puerperal [childbed] fever, while Second Clinic’s percentage was only two to four percent.

Why was there such a vast disparity?

The death of a fellow doctor provided Semmelweis with his central insight:

[pullquote align=”right” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]If Semmelweis had created a slogan it would have been “Disinfected Is Best.”[/pullquote]

One of his colleagues pierced his skin on a scalpel while performing an autopsy and died from the infection. When Dr. Semmelweis examined the wound on his dead colleague, he found it showed the pathology as the bodies of women who died of puerperal fever.

Semmelweis realized that the cause of childbed fever was something in the cadavers and insisted that doctors wash their hands in chlorinated lime before seeing obstetric patients.

Immediately after this policy was instituted, mortality rates dropped 90%…

He broadened his theory to include infected but still-living women, not just corpses, and ordered doctors to wash between patients, too, and the numbers of infections fell even further. When Dr. Semmelweis included the medical instruments used on the women, the rate of infection dropped to around one percent.

If Semmelweis had created a slogan it would have been “Disinfected Is Best.”

What was the response to this astounding discovery? Nothing but abuse.

But Dr. Semmelweis’s discovery was not heralded as the life-saving breakthrough it was. Instead, doctors were offended by the implication that they were dirty and needed to wash more, or that doctors could be somehow at fault for their patients’ demise…

We could call this the “Semmelweis treatment.” His insight and the remarkable improvement in patient outcomes that resulted was rejected because it offended the people who were causing the deaths. As far as his detractors were concerned, “disinfected could never be best” because that would mean acknowledging their own role in the suffering they left in their wake.

Sadly, a similar scenario is playing out today. Christie del Castillo-Hegyi, MD and Jody Seagrave-Daly RN, IBCLC, founders of the Fed Is Best Foundation, are being subjected to the Semmelweis treatment.

Like Semmelweis, Dr. del Castillo-Hegyi came to her central insight because of a tragedy in her life, though in her case it happened not to a colleague, but to the doctor herself. Her own son sustained permanent brain injuries as a result of profound dehydration. She had been concerned that her son wasn’t getting enough breastmilk, but was repeatedly reassured by lactation professionals — incorrectly — that he was receiving all the breastmilk he needed.

Dr. Castillo-Hegyi’s central insight is that insufficient breastmilk and its complications are common, affecting up to 15% of first time mothers especially in the early days after birth. She has also identified a startlingly simple treatment that could prevent the tens of thousands of newborn hospital readmissions for breastfeeding complications each year: observing babies closely for weight loss and dehydration and having a low threshold for temporary formula supplementation. In other words, Fed Is Best.

What has she received for this critical discovery? Nothing but abuse!

Her insight and the improvement in neonatal outcomes that would result have been rejected for the exact same reason Semmelweis’ insight was rejected: it offends lactation professionals, the people who are causing the suffering of mothers and babies.

In contrast to Semmelweis, who couldn’t offer a scientific explanation for what he observed, Dr. del Castillo-Hegyi has provided reams of analysis, copiously referenced with contemporary scientific papers that have confirmed her central insight. No matter. She, Seagrave-Daly, and the Foundation have been subjected to an endless stream of abuse and invective.

Lactivist Prof. Amy Brown wrote an influential blog post entitled Why Fed Will Never Be Best:

‘[F]ed is best’ is simply putting a sticking plaster over the gaping wound that is our lack of support for breastfeeding and mothering in general.

She insists that lactation professionals — with their aggressive efforts to promote exclusive breastfeeding and avoid supplementation under almost all circumstances — are providing the best possible care. This despite the fact that exclusive breastfeeding is now the leading cause of newborn hospital readmission, responsible for tens of thousands of readmissions each year. Brown argues that what women and babies need is more of that care.

It’s the equivalent of Semmelweis’ medical colleagues who insisted they were providing the best possible care DESPITE the fact that they were actually causing patients’ deaths. It’s the equivalent of the colleagues arguing that what women needed was more of that (deadly) care.

Lactation professional Kimberly Seals Allers heaps abuse on the Fed Is Best Foundation:

… Is Fed is Best more interested in saving lives or stoking fear and anger among women? …

Perhaps FIB is only interested in speaking into their own echo chamber and putting out reports. And telling inflammatory stories designed to incite emotions but they are short on actions with others …

She’s and many of her sympathizers — particularly lactivists who run Facebook pages — are no different from the physicians who heaped abuse on Semmelweis.

There’s actually a Facebook group entitled “Fed Ain’t Best” whose administrators use a defaced version of the Fed Is Best logo as their own.

Semmelweis was nothing if not colorful in his own defense.

In an open letter to a medical editor he wrote:

I denounce you before God and the world as a murderer, and the History of Puerperal Fever will not do you an injustice when, for the service of having been the first to oppose my life-saving [treatment] …, it perpetuates your name as a medical Nero.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say Amy Brown, Kimberly Seals Allers and lactivist bloggers are medical Nero’s, but they are definitely on the wrong side of history. I have no doubt that, like Semmelweis, the Fed Is Best Foundation will ultimately be recognized as having been correct all along.

The only question is how many babies and mothers have to be harmed in the meantime by lactation professionals who —like Semmelweis’ detractors —have put their own egos above patient wellbeing.

11 Responses to “The Fed Is Best Foundation gets the Semmelweis treatment”

  1. rational thinker
    September 17, 2019 at 5:25 pm #

    I could never be a nurse in a maternity ward, I would be fired for feeding babies that are starving by sneaking them formula in the dark storage room formerly known as the well baby nursery.

  2. Queen Khentkawes
    September 17, 2019 at 1:27 pm #

    Since you went to Harvard, I know you know about Oliver Wendell Holmes. But just for everyone else out there: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., besides being a writer and father of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was a noted doctor. He wrote a paper in 1843 about women being infected with puerperal fever by their doctors. He was roundly criticized for this at the time. Holmes wrote, “I had rather rescue one mother from being poisoned by her attendant, than claim to have saved forty out of fifty patients to whom I had carried the disease.” Words literally to live by.

  3. NoLongerCrunching
    September 17, 2019 at 1:23 pm #

    LCs are never going to acknowledge that del Castillo-Hegyi and Segrave-Daly were right, even as their profession goes down in flames once it is widely accepted that the threshold for medically necessary supplementation needs to be lower.

    • Heidi
      September 17, 2019 at 1:48 pm #

      I think you might be right. There was a UK lactation consultant making the claims that breast milk prevented the flu, but when I questioned if breast milk really had the right kind of antibody and provided information that explained that, she claimed Segrave-Daly couldn’t be trusted. I asked why she couldn’t be trusted, what was she saying that was untrue and all I got back was that Segrave-Daly hates breastfeeding. Okay. . . They will literally say the sky is green if FIB says the sky is blue.

      • Heidi
        September 17, 2019 at 1:51 pm #

        And this wasn’t even a breastfeeding forum. It was a vegetarian/vegan forum where I think a mom was asking about soy vs. cow milk formula since she didn’t produce enough. But sure let’s take the opportunity to do some low-key mommy shaming and discourage actual vaccinations!

        • rational thinker
          September 18, 2019 at 3:04 pm #

          Sometimes I dont even think this is about breast milk, lactivism, mothers or babies for some of these people. I think some of the more hardcore mommy shaming lactivists that spend most of their time online lecturing other women are just using this as an excuse to bully just like they did in high school so they can feel better about themselves.

        • demodocus
          September 26, 2019 at 6:08 pm #

          That’s gotta be some problem for a vegan, considering how they feel about using any animal’s milk versus the rumors about too much soy. I hope she was able to ignore the fools enough for her baby to thrive.

          • Heidi
            September 26, 2019 at 6:55 pm #

            Thankfully it didn’t get too nonsensical. A few naive, ignorant folks who really think lactation problems can be solved by unregulated supplements said their bit but got shot down. I know I for one told her if you are worried about soy then don’t do it. It’s a year, not a big deal in the grand scheme of things (since actually most formula isn’t vegetarian either because of fish oil).

      • mabelcruet
        September 18, 2019 at 5:08 am #

        That’s that ridiculous spit back theory-for some reason that has really struck a chord with them and they believe it absolutely. I think it’s because it goes along so well with their magical thinking about breast milk-after all, twinkly mama magic makes this elixir of immortality that can cure all known diseases, so why shouldn’t the breast be able to detect what type of virus the baby has and instantly produce the right antibodies for it?

  4. fiftyfifty1
    September 17, 2019 at 11:27 am #

    Wow. I just read more about him and his death. His colleagues got him committed to an insane asylum where he was beaten by a guard and died of an infected wound.

    • mabelcruet
      September 18, 2019 at 12:53 pm #

      There’s a long and inglorious tradition of sneering at new ideas in medicine-William Harvey was ostracised by colleagues when he described the circulation of blood, Crick and Watson were told to stop doing their DNA research because it was pointless, Barry Marshall spent years trying to convince people that stomach ulcers were bacterial in nature and only convinced them when he drank infected stomach juices and grew an ulcer himself, Barbara McClintock was laughed at so much she stopped publishing data for years (and then won a Nobel prize for it). And sometimes we aren’t exactly professional with each other-look at the disgraceful fighting over the discovery of HIV and the stolen samples.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.