Waterbirth: Barbara Harper spreads stupidity

I suppose you can’t expect much from someone who admits that her entire career is based on an article she read in the National Enquirer.

My introduction to waterbirth was an article in the National Enquirer of all places! Can you imagine basing two and a half decades of work for mothers and babies on that sensational news rag??

But Barbara Harper asserts the safety of waterbirth with such breathtaking stupidity that even I am shocked. That she believes she can get away with it tells me that she assumes that her followers are gullible fools. Given her popularity, she may just be right.

Harper is surely aware that babies drown at waterbirth. She must be aware that Ireland suspended waterbirths when baby Harry Eccles died of brain damage caused by drowning. She cannot possibly be ignorant of the fact that the waterbirth babies are born directly into the equivalent of toilet water that has been contaminated with fecal material. She must know that the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)has declared that waterbirth is not safe for babies. She is betting on the fact that her supporters don’t know about the waterbirth deaths, don’t understand that the water is contaminated with dangerous microorganisms and aren’t aware of the pronouncements of the AAP.

Harper clearly thinks that keeping her followers ignorant of dangers of waterbirth is justified. But I can’t fathom what led her to believe that she could simply make up scientific sounding gobbledy gook and pass it off as “facts.”

Purveyors of pseudoscience take note: when it comes to spewing stupidity, Barbara Harper is in a class by herself. Consider the following, taken from Harper’s explanation of Waterbirth FAQs:

What prevents baby from breathing under water?

There are four main factors that prevent the baby from inhaling water at the time of birth:

1. Prostaglandin E2 levels from the placenta which cause a slowing down or stopping of the fetal breathing movements. When the baby is born and the Prostaglandin level is still high, the baby’s muscles for breathing simply don’t work, thus engaging the first inhibitory response.

2. Babies are born experiencing mild hypoxia or lack of oxygen. Hypoxia causes apnea and swallowing, not breathing or gasping.

3. Water is a hypotonic solution and lung fluids present in the fetus are hypertonic. So, even if water were to travel in past the larynx, they could not pass into the lungs based on the fact that hypertonic solutions are denser and prevent hypotonic solutions from merging or coming into their presence.

4. The last important inhibitory factor is the Dive Reflex and revolves around the larynx. The larynx is covered all over with chemoreceptors or taste buds. The larynx has five times as many as taste buds as the whole surface of the tongue. So, when a solution hits the back of the throat, passing the larynx, the taste buds interprets what substance it is and the glottis automatically closes and the solution is then swallowed, not inhaled.

Every word in that explanation is a lie, with the possible exception of “and” and “the.” And it’s not merely a collection of lies. It is a collection of strikingly stupid lies, to boot. Either the woman is an idiot, and she thinks her followers are idiots, or both.

Let’s look at each claim individually.

1. Prostaglandin E2 causes a slowing down or stopping of the fetal breathing movements.

This is both a lie and irrelevant. It is a lie because there is not a single study on humans or animals to support it. It’s irrelevant because fetal breathing movements (practice breathing in the womb) are NOT the source of a baby’s initial drive to breath. Lack of oxygen and build up of carbon dioxide stimulate neonatal breathing.

2. Hypoxia causes apnea and swallowing, not breathing or gasping.

Another bare faced lie. Hypoxia (lack of oxygen) makes it MORE likely that a infant will try to breath, not less.

3. So, even if water were to travel in past the larynx, they could not pass into the lungs based on the fact that hypertonic solutions are denser and prevent hypotonic solutions from merging or coming into their presence.

Oh, the stupid, it burns!

I guess Harper figured the use of the word “hypertonic” would impress her followers and trip them up. In chemistry, the suffix “tonic” refers to the concentration of electolytes and other dissolve components of cellular fluids. Isotonic is the the same concentration as cellular fluids; hypertonic means higher concentration (such as seawater), hypotonic mean lower concentration (such as freshwater).

The water in the tub at waterbirth is hypotonic; that much is true. All the rest is a giant lie. Lung “fluid” (whatever that is supposed to be) is isotonic, not hypertonic. The tonicity of a fluid has NOTHING to do with what can be mixed with it. Seawater is hypertonic. Fresh water is hypotonic. According to Harper, you couldn’t add freshwater to a cup of seawater because the seawater would prevent the solutions from merging. You don’t even have to try that experiment for yourself to know that Harper is babbling nonsense.

4. The last important inhibitory factor is the Dive Reflex.

Another lie. Harper is four for four!

The dive reflex exists, but it is not operating during waterbirth. The dive reflex is the reason that people sometimes survive long immersion in icy water. The extreme cold suppress breathing and slows down heart rate, decreasing the body’s need for oxygen. The dive reflex works in COLD water, not warm water, and, of course, the water in the birth pool is warm, not icy cold.

The bottom line is very simple. Barbara Harper is a mendacious fraud. She lies and she spreads stupidity. Tragically, many women believe her.

13 Responses to “Waterbirth: Barbara Harper spreads stupidity”

  1. Midwife Tiffany
    March 3, 2015 at 12:43 am #

    I think you need to do more research, and find something else to be so negative about. Barbara Harper is a wonderful knowledgeable women. Waterbirth is beautiful and amazing. It takes a trained professional to know the safety guidelines, however I have never ever seen any harm done to a baby.
    Tiffany Gallo
    Midwife, Los Angeles CA

  2. cuicacani
    May 31, 2014 at 7:53 pm #

    I am a Mexican Midwife, I am sad to read you Doctor, still I read the whole article just to see how you join the bunch of doctors who have invested their whole life in getting your credentials to justify their deep spiritual disconnection, trying ( as we say in Mexico ) to block the sun with your finger.
    All men and women that have had a step on this earth before your kind, were born with midwives. We posses a gift , we do not need credentails. Spirits recognize spirits, you see? Dra. Harper might be wrong or right, what do you know. I find you beyond scepticism a very rude person, no woman who is clear in her mind would even approach to your office, you sound as may be you would bite. Good luck with your deep investigations may be you get the highest achievement on bitterness.

  3. Elena
    October 22, 2013 at 1:16 pm #

    This article sounds like it comes from a place of jealousy and hate. I can’t believe this is the voice of a ‘professional’ doctor. Really?!
    As a woman going through her first pregnancy, I have been doing a lot of my own research and sadly I do not find this article helpful or informative in any way. Instead I find it hateful and lacking information (i.e waste of time).

    • Wren
      October 22, 2013 at 1:27 pm #

      Your own research? Where are you doing this research? Will it be published soon?

    • I don't have a creative name
      October 22, 2013 at 1:35 pm #

      Who cares about the tone, if the facts are correct? Try to refute them. If she’s right, she’s right. Or perhaps you’d rather listen to the sweet, smiley voices of those who tell you this extremely dangerous and stupid practice is just safe as can be, and the fact that it’s a lie is okay since their words are so syrupy sweet..

      And honestly, jealous of what? I don’t understand this claim that NCB advocates always make. I don’t like their unsafe practices, and I don’t like them trying to make vulnerable women buy into them as well. How does this make me jealous, and of what?

    • expat in germany
      July 5, 2013 at 2:57 pm #

      Did you notice that barbara harper was listed in the references? Red flag. Pseudoscience.


  1. buy dmt - November 8, 2021

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: skepticalob.com/2010/10/waterbirth-barbara-harper-spreads.html […]

  2. Aer conditionat - September 27, 2021

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: skepticalob.com/2010/10/waterbirth-barbara-harper-spreads.html […]

  3. Text your ex back by Michael Fiore - February 16, 2013


    […]although web-sites we backlink to beneath are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are really worth a go by, so have a look[…]…

  4. survey korner - February 16, 2013


    […]below you’ll come across the link to some web sites that we feel you should visit[…]…

  5. games yepi - February 15, 2013


    […]Sites of interest we have a link to[…]…

  6. gaming marketplace - February 15, 2013


    […]please take a look at the web pages we follow, including this one particular, because it represents our picks through the web[…]…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.