The Trust Birth Criminals Conference

The time is fast approaching for this year’s iteration of that farce known as the Trust Birth Conference. I’ve written about the inanity of the conference in the past (The Let’s Pretend Birth Is Safe Conference).

When I first wrote about it in 2008, I observed:

I can’t wait. It promises an endless stream of misinformation, wishful thinking and inane pronouncements for me to write about. It is essentially a giant festival of magical thinking: if we all wish really, really hard, birth will be safe. Death in childbirth is just a failure of the imagination.

I was not disappointed. This year, however, the conference illustrates the fact that death in childbirth is a direct result of hiring a birth criminal as attendant. What is a birth criminal?

A birth criminal is a midwife who ignores the growing pile of tiny bodies, babies who died preventable deaths as a result of her direct or indirect professional actions. Lisa Barrett is hardly the only birth criminal, and hardly the only birth criminal lauded for her despicable actions.

Several well known birth criminals are speakers at this year’s conference. They include Lisa Barrett who has presided over at least FIVE preventable deaths of term babies in the past few years, Canadian birth criminal Gloria Lemay who has presided over more term homebirth deaths than anyone can count including a famous case that reached Canada’ highest court.

In that case:

After five hours of second stage labour, the child’s head emerged and no further contractions occurred. Sullivan and Lemay attempted to stimulate further contractions but were unsuccessful. Direct pressure was applied to the uterus, causing soreness to the mother’s stomach and back and some bruising. Approximately twenty minutes later, Emergency Services were called and the mother was transported to the hospital. Within two minutes of arrival, an intern delivered the baby using what the trial judge characterized as “a basic delivery technique”. The child showed no signs of life and resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful.

The case was dismissed on a technicality; because Lemay was so grossly inept, the child died before the body was completely born and therefore was classified as a stillbirth, not a neonatal death.

That was hardly Lemay’s first or only bout of serious legal trouble:

On January 4, 2002, BC Supreme Court Justice Blair found Lemay guilty of criminal contempt of court for attending ten births over a five-month period in defiance of the court injunction. At sentencing, the judge rejected Lemay’s lawyer’s request to impose a conditional sentence. The judge said he was not satisfied a conditional sentence would protect the safety of the public. “This is not an isolated breach but a continued series of breaches,” the judge said in his oral reasons for judgement.

Late in January of 2002, just weeks after being found guilty, Lemay managed another labour planned to be a home birth, which was later investigated by the police after the parents filed a complaint. This non-progressive labour went on for more than two days. Lemay is alleged to have performed a number of restricted acts during that time, including artificially rupturing the membranes. When meconium was apparent, Lemay is said to have stayed at home with the labouring mother for many more hours.

During sentencing the judge made note of this incident, pointing out that when the fetus became compromised Lemay failed to accompany the mother to Burnaby Hospital and told the mother not to mention Lemay’s name to hospital staff. An emergency cesarean was required…

Justice Blair also noted Lemay was previously found in contempt of court for refusing to give testimony at an inquest probing the 1994 death of a newborn in her care. The inquest found that the baby died of cardiac arrest as a result of an infection acquired during this birth attended by Lemay.

This year there is a new birth criminal on the roster, Kristi Zittle. I wrote about her in September 2008 (CPM presides over 2 separate deaths in 6 weeks).

The evidence presented at her suspension hearing is chilling. Regarding Patient A:

… Ms. Zittle did not perform a vaginal examination of Patient A until … approximately six hours after contractions began and approximately 27 hours after the spontaneous rupture of membranes, at which time Ms. Zittle incorrectly identified the presence of a nuchal hand.

Although a vaginal examination at 5:02 a.m. … revealed Patient A to be 8 centimeters dilated with the foot, thigh, and shin of the left foot presenting, Ms. Zittle … did not transfer Patient A to the hospital. Even though Ms. Zittle had never before performed a breech delivery, she opted to continue with a home delivery ..

Delivery of Patient A’s infant began at approximately 6:06 a.m., when the left foot delivered… Ms. Zittle … did not physically intervene to assist the delivery of the infant until approximately 6:35 a.m., when the pulsating umbilicus emerged and Ms. Zittle used her right hand to prevent cord compression. The infant’s buttocks emerged at 6:22 a.m. and by 6:38 a.m. the chest, only to the nipple line, had cleared the cervix. Although Ms. Zittle subsequently noted that the umbilical pulse was getting weaker and, at 6:40 a.m., documented the absence of a fetal heart rate, she did not initiate a 911 call until after the infant was born at 6:42 a.m. in a lifeless condition… Ms. Zittle immediately began performing Delee suction of the mouth, then nose, and began performing CPR, which she had never performed before on an infant.

An autopsy on Patient A’s infant revealed that the liver had ruptured, spilling 55 cc’s of blood into the abdomen, and also that the infant was positive for Group B strep infection. The Medical Examiner who performed the autopsy stated that the condition of the liver indicated that the infant had been breech for some time; that the rupture had developed over time, most likely from being pressed against Patient A’s hard pelvic floor; and that “a c-section would have been life saving in this case.”

Patient B, expecting her 3rd child:

Ms. Zittle failed to respond in a timely fashion to … the intensification [of patient’s contractions] around 10:O0 p.m. on June 9, 2008, in that she did not leave to go to Patient B’s home to attend her labor and delivery until approximately 12:34 a.m. … notwithstanding the 45-50 minute drive anticipated to Patient B’s home and the fact that Patient B was located approximately 17 miles from the nearest hospital and lacked transportation at that time…

En route to Patient B’s home, after Ms. Zittle was aware that Patient B was in the midst of a footling breech delivery, EMT personnel informed Ms. Zittle by telephone that Patient B’s infant had been delivered up to the chest but they were unable to further deliver the infant. Notwithstanding this information, Ms. Zittle instructed EMT personnel not to take Patient B to the hospital, but instead to assist Patient B in delivering her infant at home in the birthing tub. Ms. Zittle also instructed EMT personnel to wait for her arrival, estimated to be approximately 30 minutes later, before transporting Patient B to the hospital.

After transport to the emergency room by EMS, at approximately 1:37 a.m. …, Patient B delivered an infant with a distended abdomen and without respiration, color, movement, or a heartbeat, who was pronounced dead… The cause of death listed on the death certificate was umbilical cord entanglement and compression subsequent to breech delivery.

These women are hardly more than baby-butchers. Between the three of them, they have presided over the entirely preventable homebirth deaths of perhaps dozen infants or possibly more. Instead of being in jail where they belong, they are invited as honored guests at a conference that is nothing more than a festival of ignorance.

They do serve as an object lesson, however. Trusting birth leads to dead babies and, therefore, only fools and criminals trust birth.

19 Responses to “The Trust Birth Criminals Conference”

  1. Kate B
    November 11, 2013 at 7:03 pm #

    Anger Management with OJ Simpson anyone?

  2. Kate B
    November 8, 2013 at 9:16 am #

    I thought she was joking too. You’re not telling me that’s an actual THING?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. http://www.examiner.com/article/paydayloans - February 13, 2015

    http://www.examiner.com/article/paydayloans

    […]that is the end of this article. Here you’ll uncover some web sites that we assume you’ll value, just click the links over[…]

  2. surprise egg - February 13, 2015

    surprise egg

    […]the time to study or check out the content material or sites we have linked to beneath the[…]

  3. paintless dent repair training - February 12, 2015

    paintless dent repair training

    […]check below, are some completely unrelated internet websites to ours, nevertheless, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

  4. Host family forum - February 11, 2015

    Host family forum

    […]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

  5. super fast reply - February 10, 2015

    super fast reply

    […]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine several unrelated information, nevertheless really really worth taking a look, whoa did 1 find out about Mid East has got additional problerms as well […]

  6. log-cabins - February 10, 2015

    log-cabins

    […]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[…]

  7. computer support croydon - February 7, 2015

    computer support croydon

    […]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not connected to ours, we really feel they’re really worth a go through, so have a look[…]

  8. zochwell - February 6, 2015

    zochwell

    […]just beneath, are quite a few totally not associated web sites to ours, however, they are certainly really worth going over[…]

  9. victoria electrical contractor - February 6, 2015

    victoria electrical contractor

    […]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I enjoy but don’t get a great deal of link enjoy from[…]

  10. http://www.menage-poly.com/service-de-menage-residentiel.html - February 6, 2015

    http://www.menage-poly.com/service-de-menage-residentiel.html

    […]although internet websites we backlink to below are considerably not associated to ours, we feel they may be in fact really worth a go via, so have a look[…]

  11. Google - February 4, 2015

    Google

    Although web-sites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we really feel they’re in fact really worth a go through, so possess a look.

  12. top article - March 21, 2013

    Title…

    […]The information and facts talked about within the report are a few of the best out there […]…

  13. numbness in feet - March 21, 2013

    Title…

    […]Here is a superb Weblog You might Uncover Interesting that we Encourage You[…]…

  14. hair - February 16, 2013

    Title…

    […]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I appreciate but do not get a lot of link appreciate from[…]…

  15. games yepi - February 16, 2013

    Title…

    […]we prefer to honor many other net sites around the web, even though they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages really worth checking out[…]…

  16. cells - February 16, 2013

    Title…

    […]that may be the finish of this report. Here you will obtain some web-sites that we believe you’ll enjoy, just click the links over[…]…

  17. market forums - February 15, 2013

    Title…

    […]Sites of interest we have a link to[…]…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.